Corollary: We'll never trash this place so bad w nukes or climate change that somewhere else is a better option. When the asteroid hit 66 mil yrs ago it was a nicer day than today on Mars--otherwise no animal life would have survived. So we better learn to live here. This is it.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Plus, you know... fixing the whole “not having a magnetic field to protect you from radiation” thing. That might be harder than raising temperature
-
Yes! This is main gripe with wanting colonise Mars. The lack of magnetic field is extremely important and I have never heard d anyone come up with a solution for getting around that.
- Još 11 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Anyone who is serious about terraforming Mars should first practice on the Sahara desert. (More air, less radiation).
-
We are already busy teraforming Antartica and Greenland...
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
It's not that hard. Have you read the paper by Kuato et al. (1990) on turbinium reactor technology as a possible means of manufacturing breathable atmosphere for Mars?
-
I'd rather we just stopped burning fossil fuels.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
...or we could actually take care of our home planet?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Pretty easy to solve global warming. You know how long it took France to change nearly their entire grid to clean nuclear energy? Just barely longer than a decade. We could do it in less time as we have better tools and already have 37% clean grid.
- Još 18 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
:THE ENDS OF THE WORLD on
's worst mass extinctions