It pledges to eliminate the current spending deficit on a forward-looking five year rolling timescale - so objective failure is impossible
-
-
-
And there is a target to reduce debt not as a share of actual GDP buy of "trend" GDP - which seems nebulous
-
Also when interest rates are as low as they can be, as perhaps they are now, the fiscal rules would be suspended
-
That said Office of Budget Responsibility would be responsible to parliament and would be mandated to "blow the whistle"
-
So would Labour government have sensible Keynesian flexibility to borrow when economy needs support or would it have licence to be reckless?
-
#Brexit will require massive investment to make it work. It'd be insane to combine it with small state conservatism and deficit fetishism. -
Multipliers in health currently estimated at 3x, why the hell are we still cutting and not spending. It's like the Tories want low growth.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is any of this actually even possible?
-
Of course it is, the myth is they're using EXTRA money when infact they're using money that ALREADY EXISTS in the system, back to where was
-
In fact lower than where it was 10 years ago , just proves fiscal stimulus in way of corporate welfare to tune of £500bn should be used else
-
Where ,that is every single year corporates get tax breaks this is only from principle 100 odd out of over 1000,wage/other growth not occurd
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Robert, that really isn't important. Govt doesn't need to balance the fiscal budget. That section only serves to appease monetarists.
-
The real scandal is how we have neglected investment even when we can see people's incomes have dropped drastically
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It is the Great Leap Forward. To the 70s.
-
You mean the 1970's when we cld buy a 3 bed detached house for £5,750 and
#oodbanks were unheard of? Tories want to take us back to 1800s! -
#Foodbanks Tories want to take us back to 1800s, debtor prisons, poor hospitals, workhouses, poverty with eradicated diseases coming back!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Poor buggers earning £80,000, and relocate funds, is that taking from Peter to pay Paul ? Best to only earn £79,000
-
Poor buggers earning £80,000 are better off than 95pc of the rest of us poor buggers
-
Very true, but what ever you do don't thrive and work hard to achieve more...
-
Consider the bigger picture. Under this manifesto so many other costs will be lower.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.