Ludwig von Mises on that nonsense that is the "pure" entrepreneur, who when not owning capital can make profits but not suffer losses. (Human Action, p. 254)
Find the hole in the Wray piece, which says exactly what I have said. It's a historical extension of Tobin's observation. I'll wait. Please cite page numbers and quotes.
New paper: "Is It Money Because It Is Redeemed in Tax Payments? A Response to Kelton and Wray"
I analyze @StephanieKelton's and L. Randall Wray's claim that fiat currency has value (and is money) because it is used to pay taxes.
Forthcoming in the #QJAE: https://doi.org/10.35297/qjae.010151…
Ludwig von Mises on that nonsense that is the "pure" entrepreneur, who when not owning capital can make profits but not suffer losses. (Human Action, p. 254)
Authorities continue to crack down on cash and private transactions globally.
India removing the highest-denomination 2000 rupee note from circulation, despite it being worth less than $25 USD.
https://reuters.com/markets/currencies/indian-rupee-poised-weaken-after-central-bank-pulls-2000-rupee-notes-2023-05-22/…
New paper with @NewmanJ_R : what is inflation?
Where we explain why the classical understanding of inflation as an increase in the supply of paper money best captures the essence of inflation
https://qjae.scholasticahq.com/article/77391-what-is-inflation-clarifying-and-justifying-rothbard-s-definition…
: what is inflation?
Where we explain why the classical understanding of inflation as an increase in the supply of paper money best captures the essence of inflation
Tacit knowledge is trending so I thought I'd share some classroom activities I use to teach the concept. I start with an in-class exercise with questions like these.
Plenty of academic articles have led to Twitter debates. But how many Twitter debates have moved their way over to the pages of a peer-reviewed journal?
New paper: "Is It Money Because It Is Redeemed in Tax Payments? A Response to Kelton and Wray"
I analyze @StephanieKelton's and L. Randall Wray's claim that fiat currency has value (and is money) because it is used to pay taxes.
Forthcoming in the #QJAE: https://doi.org/10.35297/qjae.010151…
People seem to think that businesses lobby Congress for #deregulation and #freemarkets. They don't. They lobby for favors: specific deregulations that benefit themselves and regulations that damage competitors (real or potential).
Free markets benefit consumers, not businesses.
It's confusing how often terms mean very different, if not opposite, things in colloquial language and scholarly discourse. Such as "in theory," which in the former means "hardly/not true" but in the latter suggests it should or must be true given everything that we know...
My request from the critics of Austrian economic theory is this: let's have a real discussion instead of your projecting your weaknesses onto "Austrians." I've made clear where you must target proper critiques, but nobody seems willing to accept the challenge...
(2) stating that Austrian economics is "not economics" is embarrassingly ignorant: not only was it one of the original marginalist schools of thought, it was also one of the main streams until the unfortunate formalization/mathematization of the economics discipline.
(1) to be political (rather than positive) the theory must leave room for value judgments. Austrian economics doesn't: it's purely deductive logic with the theory derived from the action axiom. This means you have two options for critique: an axiomatic error or problematic logic.
Funny how critics, always from the 'left', dismiss Austrian economics for supposedly being political or even "not economics." If you are to criticize (or dismiss) something you should at least be aware of the basics. Both of the aforementioned "points" are very wide of the mark.
This is not intended as a jab at anyone, as done appear to think. I am myself an economist and professor, not a professor of economics (although I teach courses also in the economics department).
Imagine thinking that #economicgrowth refers to how much more resources are used [wasted] and not how much more valued output they produce--and critique it on that [false] basis...
Here is a definition of degrowth that defines the term as growth, just different
I guess “different growth” is not as catchy https://degrowth.info/degrowth