The worse part is that in the book of Acts the apostles & Paul never got the memo that the Torah had been done away with & yet they are observing the Sabbath to the Biblical Feasts. Let us not forget the Didache where gentiles observe this pesky Torah also several decades after .
-
-
Umm.... I've read the Didachi, no where does it discuss keeping the feasts. Where did you hear this blatant lie? Paul kept the feasts so he could continue to minister to the Jews, this is also why he circumcised Timothy. But since Titus wasn't a Jew he never had him circumcised.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Timothy after having faith in Christ was circumcised and his father was a gentile and the mother a mediocre Jew at best . The point is there are two laws one of men's traditions which Paul does away with, the "it is said" vs the "it is written" Torah do you guys get this?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
A mediocre Jew? Did you know her personally? Or was she just mediocre because she dared marry a goyim?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
In some circles thats called unequally yoked? But for the sake of argument lets put that on the back burner and ask the bigger question why was her son not circumcised on the 8th day like all believers had done until that point ?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
There is no way of knowing the answer to that question so why ask it?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
We are the sum of our actions CS and when a mother doesn't circumcise the son on the 8th day its testimony of her walk with G-D at moment of her life not to say she didn't repent & accept Christ latter G-D allows U-turns!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Way to collectively throw millions of wonderful Christian Mothers, including mine, under the bus in one tweet.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
We are searching for the truth found in scriptures my point is not about all the mothers but rather a focus on Timothy & how he was Torah observant after his faith in Christ & subsequent circumcision not by coercion but rather obedience that was found in faith in Christ!
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
If that is true why wasn't Titus circumcised? Gal. 2:3
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Not only that, but in Philippians 3 Paul considered his own 8th day circumcision and all of his workings of the law dog#$*% in order to find righteousness through Christ not derived from the Law.
-
-
Yes CS because Paul's parents did it under a human coercion and the ORAL LAW "it is said" not under the Torah "it is written" BIG DIFFRENCE one is done with fear of man the other with fear of G-D!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The oral law of Leviticus 12:3?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.