Finally, tell us about the Congress slush fund that handles Members of Congress that are accused of Sexual Harrassment, Sexual Assaults, etc. You know about this. You are aware of this. How about reporting out on this taxpayer funded travesty.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
No person should be judged based on a sole persons statement, especially when there is no corroborating evidence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The law of this country says you are innocent until proven guilty. Yes, a female (or male) accuser should be heard. However, believed? That must be proven. Just because you want it to be true, doesn't mean it is. Given the circumstances, proving guilt seems highly unlikely.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Until you can respond to these issues with some measure of logical consistency, you are simply a
#hypocrite. It seems you are more concerned with politics, rather than the "victims" you claim to champion.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I believe Juanita Broaddrick
@atensnutThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You don't "believe" Keith Ellison's accuser. (Actually, I bet you do, but you don't actually GAF about any woman who accuses a Democrat.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Funny how none of you Dems took Clinton’s accusers serious. Called them horrid names and voted against impeachment. This whole letter thing smacks of the same tactic as the Steele dossier.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why aren’t you calling Keith Ellison’s accuser????
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.