If you are excusing Warren's threat because you hate Amazon, maybe you will care that Amazon may be able to fight any legal action initiated by Warren by citing this tweet.
Show this thread
Elizabeth Warren's Amazon tweet violated the First Amendment -- and the people defending that are depressingly reminiscent of Trump superfans and their support of his thuggery.https://patterico.substack.com/p/elizabeth-warren-violates-the-first …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I definitely hear you and agree, I just can't get too worked up about that specific case right now when we have people who are mulling whether it's fine that governments are arbitrarily trying to restrict voting. Only so much attention space
-
I'm not so sure they're trying to "restrict voting" but that's another issue.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Well, only the last sentence treads on the 1st. The rest is substantive. Nothing Trump-like about substance.
-
The last sentence is all I am talking about.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Someone just formulated their sentence in a wrong way and that’s it, let’s keep increasing inequality forever...Rich increased their wealth for a few trillions last year, while workforce participation is still depressed and many people aren’t earning like they did in 2019.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The exchange is scary: 1) Warren makes misleading demagogic statement about Amazon not paying taxes. 2) Amazon replies that they are obeying the laws Warren helped write. 3) Warren say we are going to destroy Amazon so you can't make "snotty" comments to senators. WTF.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
...so, Warren's tweet is an act of Congress that by itself limits freedom of speech? What?
-
Gotta love how this guy has a skin as thick as a post-it notepic.twitter.com/bCAFv9jl7r
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Love how if you don’t agree with a particular expansive and non-obvious application of the First Amendment, then you “don’t care” about the First Amendment and are “cut from the same cloth” as Trump supporters. People can value free speech but disagree that a tweet violates 1AM
-
Make the case. 99% of the people I have conversed with literally laugh it off — exactly like people who could not care less whether she violated the First Amendment or not.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.