Exactly right. The National Review crowd function as de facto apologists by rolling their eyes and grumbling “what’d you expect” over and over.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your argument fails because it ignores the other side of a binary choice. So, while Trump may say stupid things, his opponents seek to do stupid things. When faced with such a choice, people can opt for the lesser of evils.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Attrocities? WTF? You mean like spying on political opponents or sending young men off to war based on false pretenses? You’re killing me
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.