as it's the most bioleninist thing imaginable it could provide interesting opportunities for creating awareness
-
-
same here (well it's one of several options)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
emergent sexual selection involves a hell of a lot of rape, plunder and murder.
-
I'd like laws to rein that stuff in but you don't need state managed breeding regimes
-
Then it's just a difference between implicit and explicit statist schemes, not of their presence or absence, nor is it anything more biolen than erecting those norms in the first place.
-
I think civilizations that want to advance beyond a certain level probably limit free-for-all rape, but maybe that's just my baizuo assumptions coming through, I support omni-directional exit, not against someone trying gilead somewhere
-
Well yes, they limit a lot of behaviors and enforce a lot of norms. Sexuality in general gets put through a re-exploitable, reconfigurable and artificial game for example, at least when it's being put to good use.
-
Yes, I'm not sure we actually disagree on anything here
-
Just pointing out that insofar as there is anything like a sexual market, it is almost by the definition of civilization, regulated and distorted within it, just a matter of in what direction. (towards men, towards women, towards this or that particular interest or towards Gnon)
-
the (reproductive) market needs to be directed towards Gnon as you put it. The debate about inceldom is mainly just about casual sex it seems to me, that was the only point I was originally making
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.