Do you agree that transgenders should have a separate restroom? — No, or not necessarily.... I don't really follow this debate so I don't know the details of what...https://curiouscat.me/XenoFry/post/417728661?1524287957 …
-
-
Replying to @ParadiseDelayed
very dialectical take, proposes patchwork as ideological fragmentation while rejecting the notion of fragmenting accommodations
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @ParadiseDelayed
Hmm, murder anyone who disagrees with my particular brand of trans solidarity I guess, but I was merely noting a tension here that I thought was interesting (offering services in smaller units to please everyone? Impractical! Now let me tell you why Curtis Yarvin is great...)
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @adornofthagn
The message behind segregated bathrooms is that we're part of a society that shares some common binding assumptions, and those assumptions dictate you should use this bathroom not the others, that's the opposite of actual fragmentation
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ParadiseDelayed
As I said, it's getting dialectical in here, the same could be said about patchwork as such, couldn't it, just that the common assumption is the market/natural selection/the emergent global parchworky order
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @adornofthagn
Maybe yes, mainstream debate assumes a consensus has to be reached somehow, in a way that imply coercing minority parties into acceptance, I just think it would be better if the threshhold for talking about political divorce was at least a lot lower
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ParadiseDelayed
It's not so much a question of talking imo but of incentive and leverage, but that's ofc maybe not very
#NiceRx of me1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Apologizing for lack of nicerxness is itself nicerx, the dialectic continues!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.