when is it r/acc and when is it l/acc? if a stance/policy is considered both, would it be considered u/acc? who decides these things, anyway?
-
-
Replying to @authorpaulhunt
L/acc implies steering tech advancement towards socially progressive ends, r/acc was initially a reaction against that, supporting the acceleration of technocapital regardless of those social implications but it later developed in the direction of wanting to preserve....
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ParadiseDelayed @authorpaulhunt
politically stable structures that were seen as a necessary basis for acceleration to occur and also preserving some forms of traditional social organisation. U/ACC was a reflection on anti-praxis, how acceleration is making political action ineffective or unworkable so doesn't..
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @ParadiseDelayed @authorpaulhunt
have policies per se
11:34 PM - 22 Sep 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.