when is it r/acc and when is it l/acc? if a stance/policy is considered both, would it be considered u/acc? who decides these things, anyway?
-
-
I can imagine a world where both obtain
-
That sounds optimistic to me
-
you just need a sufficiently big population, each doing the other, kind of like how capitalism and communism both happened in the 20th century
-
That is what the right is looking for yes e.g. exit/patchwork, capital will flee to the most favourable habitat though, l/acc was seen as very lukewarm support for acceleration because so much of the reality of that could be counter to their ideals
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
politically stable structures that were seen as a necessary basis for acceleration to occur and also preserving some forms of traditional social organisation. U/ACC was a reflection on anti-praxis, how acceleration is making political action ineffective or unworkable so doesn't..
-
the political structure as a foundation supporting technological development... but doesn't this limit potential of development? can only build so much on a given base, why not tech to remake political structure?
-
technology and political structure are interdependent, oroborean, building/sustaining the other
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.