An excellent observation.
-
-
-
The excessive use of fundamental attribution [& its errors] is a key factor for the current state of discourse.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
there might be an alternative explanation: what both right and left agree on is so accepted among everyone that there isn't even the need to articulate it, thus this "illusion" is created.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Perhaps there is peril in the pretense that both “left & right” are comparable in this at scale, that the “center” is immune from the vice, and that the fundamental problem is the erosion of civil “debate.”
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Sykes is a conservative so he's alway going to be opposed by the left. In this case, is Trump representative of the right?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I think that may be true in the area of politics punditry. But most people aren’t pundits.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Or maybe about the platform itself. People are not as quick to this behavior when they have to look other in the eye.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
When it comes to Sykes, isn’t there abundant evidence that they’re both right?
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.