After consideration of the scientific concerns raised to us, @PLOSONE has corrected the study on gender dysphoria in adolescents and young adults. The decision was made after post-publication review by additional experts.https://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2019/03/19/correcting-the-scientific-record-and-an-apology/ …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
disgraceful...peer review?
End of conversation
-
-
-
Ridiculous. Get some backbone and recover some integrity. Pitiful.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank you
@PLOSONE for this correction and apology. From a trans scientist - what does the restructuring look like? will there be trans members of the review process for future papers like this? -
We’ve completed a restructure of our internal editorial team by subject areas to help them better serve individual communities and we welcome transgender scientists on our editorial board. For joining the Editorial Board please email our Editor-in-Chief at jheber@plos.org
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@joergheber this is a step in the right direction, but actions are needed to repair the damages done by peer review oversight Some actions for@PLOSONE: 1. Hire trans experts in the Ed Board 2. Issue series dedicated to trans health 3. Publish viewpoints from trans experts#rogd -
Is scientific peer review oversight of submissions now something that causes 'damage'?! Because that's how scientific publishing works - otherwise it would be magazines...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Gender variant community?? What on earth is that nonsense.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As a scientist, I am flabbergasted that you are putting the desires of a political group above scientific inquiry and reporting
-
My gast is also flabbered.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.