Humanity is currently facing extinction. The right's approach is slower, more constrained, and biased towards extinction. Why is the right's approach better? Plus classes prevent society from acting as a cohesive whole, so that has to be solved first before selection could occur
-
-
Replying to @_leftcat
"Humanity is currently facing extinction." -- Interesting if true.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
I mean, large scale die offs and ecological catastrophe aren't exactly ideal for long-term civilizational fitness either.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @_leftcat
Ecological catastrophe is a desperate leftist meme. Not enough people are going to rally around it to bail you out.
4 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
So do you think anthropogenic climate change isn't real or? If so do you really believe that warming will be held to under 2°C? That doesn't seem likely.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @_leftcat
Who will it hurt most? Quite likely to be a strategic positive.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @_leftcat
... As to the question of what is likely -- are you investing in Baffin Island? Why not?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
A huge mass of invading climate refugees seemed like it'd be something you'd want to avoid, but apparently not.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @Outsideness
Did hard borders solve things for Greece? No, not really. You really can't stop a huge mass of people if they're desperate enough.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @_leftcat
That sounds like idealism to me. No extended border is completely defensible and impermeable, just ask North Korea
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes - 14 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.