They were right. Nobody is happy on the grounds they won in--they would have preferred to win some and lose some rather than win all in one category, lose all in another.
-
-
Replying to @orthonormalist
Any right-wing goal short of absolute independence will be pawned.
2 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
-
Replying to @orthonormalist
Surrendering absolutes for bad-ratchet compromises is how the right threw everything away.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
And the left. Everyone throws everything away and no one will ever get what they want. You know better than this.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @orthonormalist
No, I don't. The notion of right-left compromise is heading straight into the trash. The only reason to hang onto it is belief in the benefits of Union. That's dying.
4 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @orthonormalist
... "Clearly, if you refuse to compromise, we'll just have to separate." -- That's the end game.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @orthonormalist
agreeing to disagree is still an agreement...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @orthonormalist
There has to be a point at which a deterrent stand-off ceases to be helpfully represented as a doctrinal convergence.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @orthonormalist
it might be a strategic optimum on both sides (no substantial agreement beyond that is needed)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
As long as game theory is considered an alternative to Hegel, and not a confirmation.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @orthonormalist
I know too little of Hegel to say. but transcendental games are supposed to not involve communication at all.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.