That's what conservatives have been saying for over a century.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
They were right. Nobody is happy on the grounds they won in--they would have preferred to win some and lose some rather than win all in one category, lose all in another.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @orthonormalist
Any right-wing goal short of absolute independence will be pawned.
2 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
-
Replying to @orthonormalist
Surrendering absolutes for bad-ratchet compromises is how the right threw everything away.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
And the left. Everyone throws everything away and no one will ever get what they want. You know better than this.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @orthonormalist
No, I don't. The notion of right-left compromise is heading straight into the trash. The only reason to hang onto it is belief in the benefits of Union. That's dying.
4 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
I have not yet been convinced that there is a viable alternative to American Imperialism for maintaining global waterways and towards libertarian transhumanism
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @orthonormalist
That's so Bush I era it's not even funny. China happened.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
Maximal realism is not something that changes with "C'mon, it's 2018 not 1990"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If "maximal realism" is pretending the NWO was anything beyond a neoconservative hallucination, it's not helping.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.