Deleuze was familiar with thermodynamics, I believe.
-
-
... It's strictly translatable into a confidence in the possibility of perpetual motion machines. (The market says 'no'.)
-
his wishful desire for identification of motion and life led inevitably to a denial of the reality of death
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe I'm understanding D's argument, but isn't it not so much a question of disbelief, but that the role of the illusion is that is obscures the intensive forces that produce the extensive? So entropy is still there, because it's perceptible, with some imperceptibility beyond?
-
yeah that's always Deleuze's trick. but if the intensive is at all times the efficient cause of individuation and entropy the result of normalization, in the end the extensive remains derivative (God's calculi are never exact).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I knew about the first article, the second one looks very interesting tho, I'll check it out. what do you mean by D?
- 17 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.