Assortative mating is in every way a more important topic than racial purity, but it's more cognitively demanding. So it tends to keep getting lost. ...
-
Show this thread
-
... Charles Murray has actually been quite crap at making this case. It's probably something that crosses the edginess horizon. ...
2 replies 0 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
... The HBD Hajnal line discussion holds the crucial point open: Endogamy isn't the answer to any practical genetics question that has been sensibly posed. ...
2 replies 2 retweets 22 likesShow this thread -
... Kinship structures are machines for the extraction of genetic resources. The most functional ones hunt. ...
4 replies 4 retweets 30 likesShow this thread -
... Evidently, that has been what worked. ...
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
... If Cathedral promotion of indiscriminate miscegenation (in the interest of global human genetic homogenization) leads back to a reactionary investment in inbreeding, then everything has been lost. ...
2 replies 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
... Congratulations -- you're neo-savages. The kinship machinery that made modernity is broken. ...
1 reply 2 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
... But Murray is still right. There's no way that is going to happen. Instead, kinship modernity will just go into hiding (and rule from the shadows).
0 replies 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Unless it's indiscriminate, not at all. You're just grasping at a crude heuristic to defend against Leftist browning teleology. ...
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @rec0nciler
... That's understandable, but it's not philosophically defensible.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.