Assortative mating is in every way a more important topic than racial purity, but it's more cognitively demanding. So it tends to keep getting lost. ...
-
Show this thread
-
... Charles Murray has actually been quite crap at making this case. It's probably something that crosses the edginess horizon. ...
2 replies 0 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
... The HBD Hajnal line discussion holds the crucial point open: Endogamy isn't the answer to any practical genetics question that has been sensibly posed. ...
2 replies 2 retweets 22 likesShow this thread -
... Kinship structures are machines for the extraction of genetic resources. The most functional ones hunt. ...
4 replies 4 retweets 30 likesShow this thread -
... Evidently, that has been what worked. ...
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
... If Cathedral promotion of indiscriminate miscegenation (in the interest of global human genetic homogenization) leads back to a reactionary investment in inbreeding, then everything has been lost. ...
2 replies 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Outsideness
ok i see what you mean now, would it still be inbreeding though if it's just amongst a broad range of europeans? Like all you need is non-first cousin marriage.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
If there are zero ultra-European human genetic resources worth acquiring, that make sense. But how likely is that?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.