The US foreign policy establishment chooses the exact wrong point on the interventionism axis, neither hot nor cold. Non-interventism is good. Unrestrained conquering is workable. Instead, they blow up a place, destroy order, then fail to put anything else in place.
-
-
Can't really call it a war when the 'enemy' states have no means to fight back.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.