Am I going to have to be the asshole that asks what level of Nominative Determinism it is when the guy making an opinion piece about "let's talk about genetic group diffierences but like, in a non-nazi way please" is called Reich? https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/23/opinion/sunday/genetics-race.html …
-
Show this thread
-
Whatevs, it is a step in the right direction of course, so since no good deed goes unpunished, I fully expect him to suffer from it. @ me updates, I want to be wrong here
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Related to"let's talk this now that it's actual direct genetic data but sensibly, plox" this great blog entry from Graham Coop on the many troubles one would have to go through to prove the English drink more tea than the French due to genetic differences https://gcbias.org/2018/03/14/polygenic-scores-and-tea-drinking/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Hopefully with more sequencing and perhaps a way to interpret genetic data that has more insights into function than just polygenic scores this tea question will be solved and we can move on to the next topic after all interesting genetic group differences solved
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
-
Replying to @gcochran99 @SilverVVulpes
The reason admixture studies aren’t better known is they’re *too* powerful and compelling. It’s a truth that people can’t handle.
@KirkegaardEmilpic.twitter.com/V0gaOrWif1
4 replies 6 retweets 13 likes
Forget about the new model of multiculturalism being a salad bowl. The human genome is a salad bowl. (And there are a lot of different salads.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.