It's not about being disparaged in the mass media. It's about disparaging the media.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @GlomarNeverDies
I am often critical of various media institutions. As are many of my friends and colleagues, and many of us are from such overrepresented backgrounds. There is no need to conflate the two. It merely casts your own side in a negative light and conjures historical associations.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @__ice9 @GlomarNeverDies
Sure, but look at the way it goes ...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
... "Damn the Jew media!" "Jews don't all think alike." "You're right, sorry, damn the Globalist media!" "'Globalist' is an antisemitic dog-whistle."
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @GlomarNeverDies
"Ask two Jews, get three opinions." Best to simply dispute line 4. Globalism is a viewpoint. Most of the generally globalist-leaning people I know are not Jews in the first place. The identitarian left merely tried to cast it as a racial conflict, as it does whenever it can.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @__ice9 @GlomarNeverDies
Don't disagree. But failure to dispute #4 means you get #1. That's the conservation law.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @GlomarNeverDies
Eh, I would dispute both 1 and 4. Bezos isn't Jewish. Neither is Arianna Huffington. Vox and NYT, sure, but I would place HuffPo much worse than NYT or even Vox in the racial agitprop category.... I am much more concerned by the Maoists and Lysenkoists than other globalists.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @__ice9 @GlomarNeverDies
Disputing #1 and #4 is indeed the best take.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
... It's also the besieged take, sadly.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Thankfully not everyone. But enough to produce a deplorables problem.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.