Some bad takes inspired by the recent output of @EBBerger , @xenogothic and older stuff from @cyborg_nomade and @Outsidenesshttps://twitter.com/neuralshroud/status/973878954338738178 …
-
-
Replying to @neuralshroud @xenogothic and
Don't denigrate your takes! I'm currently working on several pieces (for the blog and elsewhere) that grapple with some of the issues you raise here head-on, so a scattered response is on the way...
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @EBBerger @neuralshroud and
...preliminarily though, I would like to suggest that 1) significant change in global dynamics is exactly what is on the table, and is intrinsic to the 'system', and 2) I'm skeptical that businesses are capable of achieving this sort of autonomy from the laws of supply and demand
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @EBBerger @neuralshroud and
this, but also: things aren't completely unified because top-down control is an extremely difficult informational problem (the economic calculation problem hasn't been solved, nor will it)
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @EBBerger and
why won't corporations make exit a hell? because they can't know how.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @EBBerger and
Making exit a hell is trivial. We already have bureaucracy as a proof-of-concept.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @neuralshroud @EBBerger and
and yet people regularly emigrate? hell is supposed to mean something.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @neuralshroud and
I may have misunderstood, but I don't think Neural is saying that exit is currently a hell, just that it could be made so. There are certainly contemporary examples of regimes choosing to do such a thing.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
But actually not really many. (Not that I want to obstruct the cinematic prospects of this.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.