... "If the other side wins it won 't even matter what you decide after that." -- Clearly, it then gets intense.
-
-
Show this thread
-
... "You're not voting for a government -- you're voting for an electorate." -- This is manifestly how democracy dies.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It becomes a death match... until a group of HIGHLY qualified woke af EXPERTS steps in to rule over the masses who can’t be trusted to distinguish fake news from the NYT approved facts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The US was not democratic back in 1870?
-
It could be argued it wasn’t until the end of reconstruction.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Indeed. I don't know how this is not obvious to everyone. Once a group (or "class") feels securely entrenched in power, its natural instinct is to despise those outside its circle, and to act accordingly - which includes wilfully enacting policies that it knows hurt the outgroup.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hell, you've been reading the Greek philosophers again. Maybe de Tocqueville too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it already is a death match, with the gates too tightly shut. no need for 'once and for all' speculations.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would the same arguments apply to multiregional regimes as well as multicultural? I recall the Federalist Papers arguing that multiregional regimes would be less liable to one faction taking over.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.