In the "real world" the value of a subnormal human individual is dropping off a cliff.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
"Subnormal" is a very vague blunt vocabulary. Anti-social people can make very good workers, their biggest social relations are often those at work, even if they're superficial. And what's more, isolated ppl are entirely dependent on the market for survival
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RealEnverHoxha
"Subnormal" means (in economic terms) incompetent.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @RealEnverHoxha
... "But, but ... no one's really incompetent ... oh frack how does this narrative go?" * increasingly incoherent shrieking from the Cathedral *
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
Nice strawman, man, but incompetence has very little to what either Nietzsche, nagle or Marx was talking about. If you're mad ppl are sentimental about their handicapped grandpa, that's fine, has very little to do with our economic and political situation
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RealEnverHoxha
Differential labor quality has everything to do with our "economic and political situation".
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
That capital and markets disciplines labor is already a given, one hour of labor in a Norway is worth about one hour of labor in China in terms of productive capability, there are simply greater social standards and thus greater costs and rent of labor in Norway.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RealEnverHoxha @Outsideness
The difference is by and large economic not biological.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Outsideness
Has biology radically changed in the last 40 years to give the Chinese an edge, or has global capitalism developed?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
"I've got a million hours of labor time to sell." "Is it in Guangdong or Somalia?" "Why do you even want to know?"
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
They'd want to know because of the status of infrastructure and security. Two things China had neither of 70 years ago, was that biological as well?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RealEnverHoxha @Outsideness
it's hardly about the last 100 years:http://www.unz.com/article/how-social-darwinism-made-modern-china-248/ …
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.