"It is a uniquely Anglosphere problem ..." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IBegL_V6AA … (51 minutes in)
-
-
Playing out neurobiological possibility according to the same old motivational spectrum is only worthwhile as a jumping off point, not as an excuse to churn round further ignorance. You seem to enjoy that, the mastication of mediocrity characterising Neoreaction & the All-Trite.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course, it's obvious that "disgust would be a moral emotion". Morality is merely custom, the customary. The customary, is a repeated distribution. Disgust, as a particular repeated distribution pattern, is necessarily customary. So what?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The notion of a 'regulatory system' leaves open the question of its teleology. Stupid teleologies can neither 'conserve', nor 'grow', nor 'adapt'. Narrow, fundamentalist, teleology, done stupidly, is the conservation of ever diminishing returns.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
32:24 "and stay, and stay [looks upward] and stay on the back, let's say. That's a really complicated metaphor of the snake" There's the 'open' admission of the forked tongue, serpent nature of the Occident! lol
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
More accurately though, the figure of the Occidental leech, is probably more appropriate.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
34:56 Why should 'common sense' be an arbitrator of judgement? Especially in uncommon conditions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
40:30 No, it's the USA that is 'fundamentally obsessed', turning everything into an extremist religion! Could that be because it's constituted from the peasant rejects of Europe, religious nutcases, criminal types, and warmongering profiteers?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
His naturalisation of 'religious thinking' in opposition to 'scientific thinking' is simplistic and highly questionable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
41:48 The discussion, so far, has done nothing but delineate basic implications. A litany of obviousness is hardly a good basis to persuade viewers that the interlocutors possess any worthwhile criteria to discern the sophisticated from the unsophisticated.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
42:10 Ok, the fundamentalism point is reasonable, one that I keep pointing out. 43:33
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.