(Blocked, of course.)
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @GlomarNeverDies @Outsideness
her point on immortality is interesting.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @GlomarNeverDies
Is it though? Why is NRx more immortalist than Maoism? (Except for the fact it doesn't have a concrete plan to murder 100 million people.)
3 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Transhumanist immortality (not nrx) as a flight from death is right there in the the word 'immortal', not much of an insight. And the supposed link to anti-obesity hierarchy is rubbish.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @TheIllegit @Outsideness and
The postreligious/modern attempt to keep death from consciousness does interestingly explain things like plastic surgery, the cult of youth, health-nut religion, the exile of the elderly etc. But not the fact people don't like fat people.
3 replies 1 retweet 16 likes -
... or their attraction to the model of NeoCam microstate governance.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @TheIllegit and
"You're only defending Neocameralism because you don't want to die of Type II diabetes!" -- owned.
1 reply 2 retweets 19 likes -
who's been defending neocameralism or patchwork lately?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Whatever has been is NRx by definition. Anything else is smoke.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.