also, I think her main point in the thread - that NRx is driven mostly by a lust for immortality - is right (and even uncontroversial).
-
-
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @AngloRemnant
I've no idea at all why you'd think that.
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
You guys are exceptions, but the 'NRx' portion of my daily TL comprises a high volume of gym session/genes/hereditary-prospects/diet and T-measurement talk.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @qdnoktsqfr @Outsideness and
The critical part of Allison's argument is also more interesting than a simple polemic against body-purity culture.pic.twitter.com/kxPPhIQTfF
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Why "humans"? Any self-augmenting process (*ahem* capitalism / AI) is going to involve those characteristics necessarily.
3 replies 1 retweet 31 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @qdnoktsqfr and
... Without an impulse to survival -- however abstract -- there's no building of any kind whatsoever. ...
1 reply 0 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @qdnoktsqfr and
... Abstract Body building did nothing wrong.
2 replies 6 retweets 42 likes -
I'm all down with the abstract body building argument. But the rash of smug 'NRx made me fat' comments this morning annoyed me.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @qdnoktsqfr @Outsideness and
Qdn 🩸ktsqfr Retweeted Qdn 🩸ktsqfr
This is why you have no cool women doing NRx.https://twitter.com/qdnoktsqfr/status/953804843881193473 …
Qdn 🩸ktsqfr added,
4 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
We have some.
@parallaxoptics2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
...But, yes, as a general rule, having two unbroken X-chromosomes does tend to suppress autism below the NRx-level.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.