When someone says "Bitcoin governance is broken" what they really mean is that Bitcoin's decentralized governance (UASF/UAHF) did not converge on their preferred Schelling point consensus.
Instead of accepting the results, they want to ruin Bitcoin with centralized governance.
-
-
What I enjoyed most about that post was that ETH has a money supply targeting monetary policy similar to BTC’s, yet the author thinks that is barbaric goldbuggery - thus simultaneously supports ETH maximalism and NGDP targeting - completely incoherent Basically, just anti-Bitcoin
-
Bitcoin's lack of charismatic-discretionary leadership becoming intolerable to sophisticated libertarians.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.