Communism is impossible. Even the leftists know that "actually existing socialism" is a joke.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
The reason you say it's impossible is bc it never resulted in the ends that communists promised. But who cares what they promised?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Sulla2389 @Outsideness
Promises amount to propaganda. They achieve their true ends which is brahmins getting power on the backs of prols.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Sulla2389
How is that a differentiating factor? You don't think Brahmins run actually-existing fascist societies? We could check America -- ...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
According to your conception of fascism. I say fascism is an alliance between ancien regime and petit bourgeois.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Sulla2389
The ancien regime is extinct (unless you're using it in some novel sense I'm not getting).
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
Indeed, and so is fascism. The brahmin-prol alliance killed it in the world wars - which is what the wars were all about!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Sulla2389 @Outsideness
Your argument assumes its conclusion that fascism surrounds us in the present.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Sulla2389
My argument is based on a non-fetishistic definition of fascism, and does indeed conclude that it "surrounds" us in the present.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
... Fetishistic definitions of fascism are propaganda exercises, designed for distancing (based on trivial deviations).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.