Why not? This is an issue of first principles. You position relies on abstract first principles derived from Franciscan theology.
-
-
Replying to @Neoabsolutism @Outsideness and
because you're not explaining how the hell a king came to be, or how he remains or is removed.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @Neoabsolutism and
telling me the history of liberalism is not gonna solve *that* problem.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @Outsideness and
Again, same as with a science. You begin from observing a phenomena and then work to the first principles in that science.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Neoabsolutism @Outsideness and
phenomenon: kings exist(ed) conditions of possibility: ????
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @Outsideness and
Humans are inherently heirachical.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Neoabsolutism @Outsideness and
true. but they have managed to live without kings of any type for 90% of their existence, and still manage to do so in certain places.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @Outsideness and
I would reject that claim entirely.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Neoabsolutism @cyborg_nomade and
Thomas Paine on the origin of kingshippic.twitter.com/ADn0DdZrjw
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Rajilavak @cyborg_nomade and
Republican literature is uniformly confused and of no assistance.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @Neoabsolutism and
thanks for this. didn't know Urbit had turned explicitly republican. a good development given Moldbug's flirtation with monarchs.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.