So, uh, I can mathematically prove that segmentation by pointless destruction is pointlessly destructive. https://economics.stackexchange.com/questions/5706/what-do-supply-demand-curves-really-look-like …https://twitter.com/Alrenous/status/908334130030456832 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @Alrenous
Implicit in this is such a wholesale rejection of the Efficient Markets Hypothesis it leaves me a little breathless. ...
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @Alrenous
... If they've got it this badly wrong there are literally multi-billions of USD sitting on the sidewalk. (And you're seriously underpaid.)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
There are possible objections. I'll repeat the status thing. Reversible software limitations are non-destructive, sometimes have upsides.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alrenous @Outsideness
This is mainly about IC manufacturers vandalizing their own boards, which is retarded.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Alrenous
"Retarded" why? You seem to be under the sway of an extremely naive notion of techonomic optimization.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
And similarly to me you seem naively trusting of a fundamentally human process. Nullius in verba, and also nullius in fori.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alrenous @Outsideness
Simply, I can make plausible models of supply, fixed cost, and marginal cost, that shows autovandalism is retarded.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alrenous @Outsideness
This is consonant with the principle that more wealth = good. And producing more wealth will result in more profit.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alrenous @Outsideness
Do you have a model which contradicts my supply/cost model and shows they in fact profit more from the current practice? Or not?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
My only model is the actual market revelation. If I had a better one I'd be inviting you to my private island for a chat over a cocktail.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
I'm not showing markets are inefficient. I'm showing chip fab marketing is ironically not a market.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alrenous @Outsideness
A better model does not make chip fabs fall out the sky, nor the necessary engineering expertise and supply chain contacts.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.