No, I'm saying he'd be a hardcore white nationalist - that is, an altrightist and all its strains.
-
-
Replying to @Sulla2389 @Outsideness
Applying the word Nazi to someone who doesn't call themselves that is slander (may be not strictly so, but close to 100%)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Outsideness
Sure. But how many antifas would have a big problem with being called that? Not many.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Sulla2389 @Outsideness
Generally it's pretty unusual when groups object to being called something that describes them well unless it's strictly an insult.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Sulla2389
Interesting proposition, but I don't buy it. After socialists rebranded themselves as "liberals" I don't see how anyone can.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
Sounds like you take the Rothbardian (rather than the Moldbuggian) interpretation of what liberal means.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Sulla2389
"Manchester Liberal" was the last time the word was well-anchored. (Quite a while before Rothbard.)
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
I meant Rothbard's interpretation of history - modern liberalism as a corruption of classical liberalism.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Sulla2389 @Outsideness
Whereas Moldbug regards them part of the same tradition; that thinking of ideology in terms of concrete positions is improper.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
They are part of the same tradition, but then, so is Neoreaction. Schismatic Protestantism is the only Anglo tradition that matters.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @Sulla2389
... Cladistic proximity doesn't imply ideological affinity (and perhaps even more the opposite).
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.