Not a moment too soon.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @sanctusmaximus
... Once it's obvious Lysenko 2.0 comes with a 3SD IQ-sacrifice price-tag, it should begin receding quite fast. ...
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
My guess is no, more like 1 SD, at least for quite a while.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Hsu's model suggests that seriously vast IQ gains would follow quickly from simple application of what is already understood.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I'm skeptical persistent gains of that scale can be had when a program is ramped up to large
#s. But I have no special knowledge.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Hsu speculates that flipping 700 IQ-related genes (out of 10,000) to their positive alleles would result in smartest person to ever live.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Thanks for the info! I do wonder: 1) is that actually so easy to do? 2)how confident is the speculation? 3) what negative associated traits?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
The final part of this is helpful: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dn4LaowsGiA …
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @TheClarksTale and
Smartest person ever? Well, 100 billion is a very large number. But yes, up there. 300+ IQ, combining only already-existent genes.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.