You're *still* using the one-dimensional thing smh I explicitly told you to stop. Anyway, my point wrt the jacobins is that from their pov,
-
-
Replying to @adornofthagn @Marav0ne and
We haven't nearly gone far enough and in fact regressed in certain aspects, while other developments are utter blasphemous degeneracy to 'em
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @adornofthagn @cyborg_nomade and
This still doesn't go against any of what I said. There's different shades of leftism. It's still leftism in the end of the day.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Marav0ne @cyborg_nomade and
What would the unifying characteristic be, now that jacobin approval is out of the picture?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @Marav0ne and
Too vague, by that standard, the process of technocapital itself is leftist, since atomization is a form of equality
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @adornofthagn @cyborg_nomade and
The point at which liberalism stopped being able to persuade people of that is the point it became a (and basically THE) right-wing idea.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @adornofthagn and
... Marx 101: "Formal equality is a scam". We're on to the next stage now.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @adornofthagn and
... Simple anonymity supports formal equality. Demanding more than that makes you a communist. (And demanding less is romanticism.)
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @cyborg_nomade and
Where would fascists fit into that?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Good question. Some romantic and communist aspects, on initial estimation. (ID-pol and national collectivism.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.