-
-
Not convinced. Fascism is a lot more sensible than communism, so it tends to get further.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @Depopulator83
Could you give an example of a non-fascist communist regime or period that would exemplify this comparative lack of sensibility?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @adornofthagn @Depopulator83
Soviet Union before the NEP, and China during Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution were the big ones.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @Depopulator83
I get that those periods were more ideologically communist, but not in what sense they were less politically fascist
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @adornofthagn @Depopulator83
Room for much debate, but key point IMHO is how serious they are in the pursuit of internationalist collectivism. ...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
... Or, turned around, how obvious the concession to pragmatic compromise on collectivism in the defense of national interest.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @Depopulator83
What I would contest is the implication that a higher degree of internationalism or universalism played a significant role in the calamitous
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @adornofthagn @Depopulator83
I think it's more that nationalism has a pragmatic aspect, which contradicts strong (Utopian) collectivist imperatives in detail.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @Depopulator83
More to the point, it tends to be utopian and pragmatic, respectively, about different things
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Tendency to relegate the Utopian aspect to the aesthetic realm, where it does less practical damage.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.