You're being too legalistic. The execution of ownership is usage. The rest is just consensual hallucination.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @adornofthagn and
We've already been over the intersubjective nature of this. And it's demonstrable that 'consensual hallucinations' have consequences.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @mfckr_ @adornofthagn and
Sure. But they're rarely exhaustive. Capital is not merely property, it's also machinery, and legal categories don't help you there.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @adornofthagn and
… machinery whose production ends will be dictated by the whims of whoever owns it. Again, you're handwaving.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mfckr_ @adornofthagn and
"Whims" -- not really. This is why your position gets lost. ...
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @adornofthagn and
Whims, informed speculations, ratiocinative judgments, etc. Market decisions are made in many different manners.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mfckr_ @adornofthagn and
Systematic selection pushes them in a coherent direction, and that vector is what most realistically defines the process.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @adornofthagn and
Sure, there can be a convergence of many different capital-holding agents acting similarly in response to prevailing conditions.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mfckr_ @Outsideness and
I think I see the disconnect here, but I'm not sure I can articulate it. You're debating timeframes?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
M is saying "I own this thing, and can use it as I will," while Land is saying, "if you don't optimize usage, you don't own it, so it owns"
3 replies 2 retweets 10 likes
That's one of the best discussion summaries I've ever seen.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.