Universalism is an engine for useless arguments. It should be completely obvious to everyone ...
-
-
Diversity requires that some substantial sample opt for conservative paths, doesn't it? Mandatory maximum-morphogenesis will be resisted.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
OFC, but the one who approaches it the closest has an advantage over the ones afraid to approach it at all.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @PomoPsiOp
I which case geopolitical arrangements conducive to the widest-possible aggregate experimentalism should be promoted, initially. ...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness
... Premature universalistic triumphalism, in any direction, works against this.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
I suppose only having one planet to test with is an obstacle here. I suppose, if we were to simulate this, would our sims have to know?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PomoPsiOp @Outsideness
Knowing you are playing a wargame might allow you more experementality. Is that a way to know you aren't being simulated?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Less skin-in-the-game though, so probably less strategic seriousness.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
Yes, perhaps the difference between pessimism and optimism could be testing two variables.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.