fuse with capital, and that's done.
-
-
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @jelly2nes and
Pretty sure capital + anti-civ is a contradiction.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @mfckr_ @jelly2nes and
no reason to think capital autonomy is not the death of society (and thus civilisation)
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @jelly2nes and
I don't believe autonomous capital will ever be a thing though. Or that 'capital' has any meaning outside human intersubjective context.
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @mfckr_ @jelly2nes and
I know, libertarianism has this unreformed humanism that's just too hard to shake off.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @jelly2nes and
It wasn't a normatively humanistic statement.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
-
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @mfckr_ and
my point is: it's humanistic to think capital isn't in a centuries long ascent towards autonomy.
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @mfckr_ and
"but it's all for the greater good of humanity"
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @jelly2nes and
"Greater good of humanity" has nothing to do with it. Ultimately capital is a tool, not a master, and I don't see that relation changing.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
The limits of Austrian humanism come into view.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @cyborg_nomade and
'Autonomous capital' is an ontic spook—capital is a means, not an agent with its own ends.
4 replies 1 retweet 4 likes - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.