... Nations don't trade territory often, but there's no reason why they couldn't, if deeper and more fluid markets were operating.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @KalishJantzen
... There's nothing territorially 'fixed' about a state, except through inertia.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @KalishJantzen
So you basically eject human agents and create an autistic "matrix" of things.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Neoabsolutism @KalishJantzen
Human agents are already subsumed into a greater matrix of things -- physical, biological, technological, and commercial -- which selects.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Cnut the Great tried to explain, but hubristic ultra-humanists don't want to listen.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This appeal to consequences is just empty. You can't investigate anything because you haven't a clue on anthropology.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Neoabsolutism @Depopulator83 and
Worse actually, you work from assumed liberal antrhopology.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The rage against "liberal anthropology" is modern history's most continuous comedy feature.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
"You can't treat people as atomized contractual agents!" "Buzz off, we're doing serious business here."
-
-
The Jouvenel point, which you ignore, is that this is all bullshit clearing ground for central power expansion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Neoabsolutism @Outsideness and
Not sure how many ways I can convey that before it gets understood.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.