As soon as philosophy is remotely about persons, it's corrupt beyond salvage. Defer to the ideas (alone), or get out of the sand-pit.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @Alrenous and
Political philosophy kinda has to be about persons and how to actuate them towards desired ends. It's futile & wayward in a noumenal vacuum.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mfckr_ @Outsideness and
Then we have this nice dichotomy between the 'no meat' faction and the 'lead me papa' faction. Solution in the no-man's land between them.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
'No meat' can't test. 'Lead me papa' stops following if 'papa' changes his mind. Iteration is necessary, so both are stillborn.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
'No meat' is cryptographic innovation. 'Lead me papa' is the entertainment channel.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness @mfckr_ and
This illusion that there's no meat involved in the blockchain continues to bemuse me. Sakamoto wasn't an alien AI, yes?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
We've no idea. And the important thing is, it doesn't matter. "His" authority is zero.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness @mfckr_ and
Untrue. First, he needed authority to get it implemented at all. Second, blockchain design still requires meat maintenance staff.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alrenous @Outsideness and
And comprises meat factions constantly threatening various forks.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mfckr_ @Outsideness and
And my solution: allow forks. Encourage them.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
On that (it seems alone) we are in complete agreement.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.