Like how Spencer's "hail Trump" got him polarised, also made him a household name. He and media both got what they wanted. far right lost.
-
-
Replying to @ScholarAtArms @Outsideness
He had a successful speech at Auburn months after idgi
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AndrewQuackson @Outsideness
by letting himself be polarised in exchange for bigger media profile, he drove ppl away who are open to far-right but don't wanna be nazis.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ScholarAtArms @Outsideness
but Spencer isn't a "nazi". and the media painted Trump as worse than hitler.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AndrewQuackson @ScholarAtArms
Actually, calmly and strictly technically, he is a Nazi. Where do you think significant points of ideological divergence are to be found?
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
AFAIK, Spencer's been on some pan-Euro globalist kick. Not a nationalist.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You don't think the Third Reich was on "some pan-Euro globalist kick?"
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Sure. But you asked about sig. points of ideological divergence—not real-world consequences of implementation. Spencer's more of a Duginist.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
then why bring up his "pan-Euro" supernational ideas if they're just a real-world consequence of implementation?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
ffs guys, supranationalism ≠ Nazism. By that standard, EU = Nazism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Supranationalism alone isn't Nazism. The EU, however, shares Third Reich supranationalism.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.