It's not "men" and it's not "diversity" -- It's Islam. Whichever circle of hell is needed to acknowledge that is where we're going. ...
-
-
You think if the UK's minorities were overwhelming Confucian, Hindu, Buddhist, and Sikh, it would even be an issue?
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
We wouldn't have much terrorism then, but we'd still have the population replacement problem
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx @Outsideness
and the political conflict problem that will happen with any differing groups, even if it's just spoils in democracy rather than terrorism
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HbdNrx
You really don't think "any differing groups" stinks to high heaven of universalism? HBD breaks all such homogenous categories apart.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
But it's kind of the definition of differing groups. If they're different, they have different political ideas and thus conflict.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HbdNrx
That doesn't follow. There's a large space for agreement under the umbrella of broadly laissez-faire appreciation for sound government. ...
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness
There's quite a wide range of appreciation for broadly laissez-faire and sound government. Hard to find two groups with agreement on this
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Not uncommon among small states, highly-exposed to competitive realities. (Even in the Caribbean, to confound extreme racial pessimists.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.