Hence why diversity + proximity works out not so great.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @mfckr_ @Thoma_Valiant
Diversity + proximity works out just fine if the mix in question is alchemically sound -- and hellishly if it isn't.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
... You're still too fixed on Alt-Right universalism (i.e. obligate Hobbit-world).
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @Thoma_Valiant
I'm not really. Ideally I prefer a highly decentralized mosaic of emergent free-association.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
But I suspect in such a world we'd find that the principle of homophily holds truer than what you're describing.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mfckr_ @Thoma_Valiant
What I'm describing is entirely compatible with the "principle of homophily" predominating. (I'd expect roughly 20% tech-comm hybridity.)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Be nice if there was an equilibrium point somewhere short of brutal Malthusian die-off. (Getting ever harder to imagine that.)
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @Depopulator83 and
.. Either any population favoring moral-purity signals above its own survival gets culled eventually, or Darwin was wrong about everything.
1 reply 3 retweets 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.