Sovereigns don't have property, they have possessions. Property is social relation between subjects that is constructed by the sovereign.
-
-
Replying to @TAJackson20
Libertarianism actually tacitly acknowledges this by linking property to defensibility.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Neoabsolutism
This, of course, *requires* as a moral imperative that individuals each have the military capacity of states. It's wonderfully insane.
2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @TAJackson20
At least
@Outsideness is consistent on this implication.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Neoabsolutism @Outsideness
I like
@Outsideness. He's like Nietzsche/Hume: took the liberalism seriously, followed it to the logical conclusion w/o self-deception.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Even had a mental breakdown in the process just like them. Seems a requisite for being an intellectually honest liberal.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Where's the fun in AnCap geopolitical chicken-games with seed Mal-AI munitions if they're not spiked with occasional psychotic episodes?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.