I guess "neuronal volume" would be a better phrasing. the more grey mass you have, the more formats are possible.
-
-
but then again a bigger neuronal volume demands a bigger cranial capacity
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
… ever notice all those folds & ridges on the exterior surface of a human brain? That's how we pack more neurons into a smaller space.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
it's a good workaround, but subjected to bone-hard limits, surely.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Eventually. It'd just be more economical to focus on untapped neurophysiological optimization, or enhancing neuronal glucose metabolism, etc
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
brain farms sound good.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cyborg_nomade @mfckr_ and
but, tbf, I have to agree with Nick that, if Moore's Law continues, carbon-based intelligence is just no economically worth the trouble.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Dunno. To me it's weird to assume that AI is going to somehow emerge if we just slap enough silicon + algorithms together.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
isn't that a good description of how human intelligence emerged?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Nobody knows. Intelligence is a black box problem that AI fanboys refuse to take seriously.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
Capitalism is manifestly an intelligenic process. Start from there, not Scholastic chin-scratching.
-
-
It is, but I wouldn't consider markets a literal intelligence unto itself.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
why?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.