no, because they can hold a conversation, go is uninteresting in threats, no one ever threatened anyone with go
-
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
no, someone being very good at stamp collecting is not a threat for you getting punched in the face
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @heuristics
The gross mechanics can be easily plugged in at the end.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @heuristics
Strategic competence envelops intention. Winning or losing make no sense without it.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
-
-
-
Replying to @heuristics
Something beats you at a game. "But it didn't have intentions." *Shrug*
2 replies 2 retweets 4 likes
... There's nothing upstairs of playing sufficiently complicated games.
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness @heuristics
Not even metaphorical thought? If you want to model reality as a game GO is orders of magnitude less complicated.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @D_01555 @heuristics
Just a couple of years ago it was unimaginable that AI would crack Go so soon. It's the most complicated formal game we know. ...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.