neanderthals had larger craniums than homo sapiens, but we have to look a lot harder to find signs of intelligence
-
-
Replying to @bitemyapp @Outsideness and
Mentioned that too, but this was hand-waved as anecdotal.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mfckr_ @Outsideness and
cranial capacity correlates more strongly with hippocampal function than what we would recognize as intelligence
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp @Outsideness and
Interesting… got a paper re: that on hand by chance?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mfckr_ @Outsideness and
here's a couple Dunbar (yeah, that guy) papers: http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/roybiolett/early/2011/07/12/rsbl.2011.0570.full.pdf … http://www.uvm.edu/pdodds/files/papers/others/1993/dunbar1993a.pdf …
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp @mfckr_ and
overall my impression is: 1. we don't have a reason to believe cranial capacity correlates strongly with IQ
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp @mfckr_ and
2. sensory processing seems to require more volume than g or be more sensitive to volume available
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp @mfckr_ and
3. If anything, if you extrapolate from data available for moderns, cranial capacity correlates inversely with IQ, but…environment.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @bitemyapp @mfckr_ and
So why is human child-birth torture, realistically? Gnon is evidently willing to rack women hard to squeeze-out bigger heads.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @mfckr_ and
hasn't c-section eliminated most of the selection pressure there too? c-sections are increasingly common albeit unfortunately not for IQ…
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
How many C-section generations have we had, yet? But yes, it's bound to be a factor eventually, for sure.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.