NATO is a geopolitical security welfare system. It's no more sustainable than the domestic version.
-
-
-
Replying to @EmperorCoolidge @BrowningMachine
I don't see that at all. (Maybe the Turks, but there are other obvious problems there.) ...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @BrowningMachine
... It's a system for outsourcing national security to the US military, at zero-cost. ...
3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @BrowningMachine
At the cost of... protecting our own hegemony. Like a Roman client or British protectorate
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
-
Replying to @Outsideness @BrowningMachine
Any arrangement which infantilizes your partners comes to grief.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @BrowningMachine
I agree that we should pressure NATO to step up their game. But NATO is worth keeping.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmperorCoolidge @BrowningMachine
No, NATO powers should transition of the tit. Anglosphere security coordination is worth keeping. That's it
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @BrowningMachine
... The idea that Turkey is a "Western ally" -- in particular -- is sheer comedy. ...
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes
... What interest does America have in keeping the Russians out of Constantinople?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.