RF's definition of communism is exactly 180-degrees off (as he'd know if he ever spoke to communists).
-
-
... Mole-Rat Stalinism is the only thing that doesn't count as "communist" in RF bizarro-world.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @ArmchairPseph
Tad unfair no? Do you consider the Stuart rule as 'communist' ?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_ @ArmchairPseph
Stuart rule didn't justify itself through Mole-Rat social totalitarianism.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Outsideness @ArmchairPseph
Were the 'enlightened absolutist' kings 'totalitarian' ?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @i_contemplate_ @ArmchairPseph
Frederick II wasn't -- but then he was basically an authoritarian liberal (and thus a 'communist' for RF).
8:44 PM - 6 Nov 2016
1 reply
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.